By logging in, you agree to our updated Terms and Policies. The articles were specific in nature and used some students as examples. Log in to Your Account. The school paper had a review process for what can and cannot be produced. Kuhlmeier was heard in the United States Supreme Court. Case background and primary source documents concerning the Supreme Court case of Hazelwood v.

By logging in, you agree to our updated Terms and Policies. Thus, the school had grounds to edit and curate the school-sponsored publication as they saw fit and in line with what they saw as proper academic standards. Close Window Loading, Please Wait! On January 13, , the Supreme Court decided a First Amendment case that had major ramifications for the constitutional rights of students. United States Korematsu v.

In Hazelwood School District v. Public – Available to anyone. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, which reversed the lower court, finding that the paper was a “public forum” that extended beyond the walls of the school. A Quick Guide to Edmund Randolph. Discuss Blog Curriki Newsletter Sign-up.

Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier () | Curriki

KuhlmeierU. Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade The law was passed to protect students from what some see as the negative academic and constitutional ramifications of Hazelwood. Curriki Rating ‘P’ – This is a trusted Partner resource. Jeff Eaton On January 13,the Supreme Court decided a First Amendment case that had major ramifications for the constitutional rights of students.


Maggie Baldridge is an intern at the National Constitution Center. It decided that school officials could censor the content only under extreme circumstances.

Hazelwood V Kuhlmeier – Kids |

Alabama Regents of the University of California v. Georgia World Trade Center Bombing. Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial. On this day, the first woman is directly elected to the Senate. Kuhlmeier is one of the most hazelwoid legal matters in U. Claiming that the school violated their First Amendment rights, the students took their case to the U.

Facts and Case Summary – Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier

The trial court ruled that the school had the authority to remove articles that were written as part of a class. The court stated that public settings, such as schools, will differ based on their location.

hazelwood v. kuhlmeier essay

Categories Civil Constitution Kids. United States Lawrence v. United States Korematsu v.

hazelwood v. kuhlmeier essay

Decision and Reasoning In a ruling, the U. The 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution ensures that all American citizens are granted the freedom to express themselves essau accordance to the law.


Supreme Court held that the principal’s actions did not violate the students’ free speech rights. Overall, the school believed that removing the articles was not kuuhlmeier a matter of impropriety, but also a matter of protecting its students; it deemed the action within its right to curate a school-sponsored publication in accordance with academic standards.

Georgia Dred Scott vs. New York Gregg v. For one, the anonymity of the interviewed students could not be guaranteed.

Some argue that the Hazelwood decision has made student journalists more vulnerable to school censorship and punishment. Constitution establishes a system of government that has powers, responsibilities, and limits that have changed over time essa that are still contested.

Forgot Username or Password? The school printed the May edition of The Spectrum sans the articles in essya the knowledge of the student journalists. Sign up for our email newsletter.